top of page

Why Being Proficient In AI Is So Important In Today’s Job Market

  • Kristy Chan
  • Jul 24
  • 5 min read
ree

The percentage of companies, since 2017, using artificial intelligence for at least one business function.


How or when will artificial intelligence (AI) take our jobs? That is the question on everyone’s mind, from senior workers to high school students. Whether it’s scripting our emails with chatbots or algorithms diagnosing illnesses faster than seasoned doctors, artificial intelligence has infiltrated our workday, reshaping roles we once thought were uniquely human. The question is no longer whether machines and AI will be used as part of the workforce, but how soon and in which industries they’ll land first. According to Microsoft’s 2024 Work Trend Index, 71% of IT employers claim that they prefer artificial intelligence skills above experience. Additionally, 66% of business leaders stated that they would not hire a candidate without basic artificial intelligence skills.


New technologies such as artificial intelligence disproportionately affect routine tasks, including data entry, telemarketing, and basic customer service, which can be automated. This then creates labor market polarization, in which the distribution of jobs is concentrated among high-skill and low-skill work. To be competitive in a world increasingly reliant on artificial intelligence is to understand how to use artificial intelligence to increase the value of human skills. Due to the rise of artificial intelligence, the mantra of lifetime employment in one industry is no longer a safe pathway for those seeking a university education. Even now, one in three companies say they no longer list educational requirements on their salaried job postings, according to Payscale’s latest Compensation Best Practices Report.


Recognizing that AI fluency often supersedes formal credentials, companies are abandoning rigid degree requirements in favor of demonstrable skills in machine learning, natural language processing, and data engineering. And if we fail to adapt, people with degrees might not even be that much better off than those without one. Talent platforms have even introduced AI-skill badges and micro-credentials, allowing applicants to prove competency through short, project-based assessments. As a result, learning pathways are shifting from lecture halls to interactive online labs, hackathons, and mentorship programs centered on real-world AI challenges. But this pivot poses a stark threat: those without basic AI literacy risk becoming bystanders in automated workflows rather than collaborators alongside intelligent systems. Lacking the ability to frame prompts, interpret model outputs, or troubleshoot algorithmic biases, workers may struggle to effectively integrate AI tools into their daily tasks or advocate for necessary ethical safeguards. In the worst case, poor AI fluency not only limits one’s career prospects but also widens the very polarization routine-biased change creates. AI has been excellent at democratizing information, creative work, and productivity for everyone. The next step is to get everyone on board to understand how exactly they can use AI in their work, when this is necessary, and to have the skills needed to navigate a world where AI is becoming more widespread. This involves understanding where to find reputable information, identifying AI-generated disinformation, implementing stronger policies on what AI should or should not be used for, and knowing how to report AI usage in a responsible and honest manner.


This change is real, and it’s happening now. Growth in AI jobs has outpaced that of all other jobs since at least 2016. Students in every higher education institution have questioned whether a degree is even worth it, as they spend hundreds of thousands of dollars only to risk being uncompetitive in a global job market now dominated by AI. Even though a degree's overall value may be declining, this does not alter the fact that universities create social capital. This is particularly true in fields where a candidate with the right connections or university prestige may be more desirable than one with extensive artificial intelligence credentials. A closer examination of AI's limitations and the unique advantages of human-led education reveals why universities remain indispensable hubs for innovation, lifelong learning, and professional development, despite legitimate concerns about automation. After all, workers or human capital are not just a quantification of what they produce. In many cases, the value of human capital consists of soft skills, such as leadership, communication, negotiation, and innovation. Thus, success may depend on the originality and inventiveness of ideas in a future where workers are dependent on artificial intelligence. Human communication, emotional intelligence, and teamwork are the most significant ways to foster these qualities.


There is real value in human intelligence. We interpret, analyze, and ethically evaluate. AI is a pattern-recognition tool that relies on surface-level skills to scour datasets and cannot contextualize information based on more emotional or analytical perspectives. Of course, labor market polarization due to AI is inevitable. After all, many technological innovations in the past have done so, from the printing press eliminating manual copy work to machines in specific manufacturing processes. Now, it’s AI in routine jobs. With every technological innovation, there are winners and losers, and AI is an example of how we must reevaluate our worth as humans in the workforce. The fact that AI cannot produce something original, groundbreaking, or radical means that humans must bridge the gap with what makes us unique. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella stated that 20% to 30% of the code for some company projects is now generated with AI. Yet the ideas behind the code—the project itself—were formed by humans, perhaps in a meeting room or lengthy email threads. If anything, overreliance on AI will render companies more vulnerable to maintaining their products. For example, if AI generated something incorrect and there was nobody to catch the mistake, it would take time, money, and human skill to identify and remedy the error. Therefore, all workers should possess basic AI literacy to use AI ethically and morally, without compromising the humanity and accuracy of their work.


Currently, the only power we have to ensure competitiveness in the workforce is to recognize that AI is not going to disappear and to possess the necessary skills and knowledge to utilize AI in ways that enhance our productivity. Many schools and universities are scrambling to make this move. Lessons on ethical usage, intellectual property protection, and applying artificial intelligence in real-world settings are a significant first step. AI literacy can make students more aware of the implications of AI for their future from an early stage, helping them plan accordingly depending on their ability to use AI or their personal preferences. As mentioned before, there is no doubt that AI will be present in every workplace. Therefore, what the world needs is to stop spreading dramatic narratives about how AI will take all of our jobs, because, at the end of the day, there is a human quality in every product and service around us. Instead, we need to collaborate and make use of AI tools for a better future.

 
 
bottom of page